The Supreme Court on Wednesday brought to a close the 19-year legal battle over the Exxon Valdez oil spill by sharply reducing the punitive damages to be paid by Exxon Mobil Corp. The Exxon-Valdez oil spill is considered to be one of the biggest man-made environmental disasters that has ever affected the United States. High court to hear Exxon Valdez damages case At issue: Should the company pay $2.5 billion in punitive damages for the 1989 oil spill? March 3, 2011; Disasters eventually end. And attorneys involved in the case say the court's ruling could have implications in other lawsuits. Supreme Court reduces damages in Exxon Valdez case. Supreme Court Takes On Exxon Valdez Case. The oil spill was caused when an oil tanker, the Exxon-Valdez, hit Bligh Reef in the Gulf of Alaska in March of 1989. A decision by the US Supreme Court in the EXXON VALDEZ case is expected sometime later this year. Summary of the Exxon Valdez, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (2001) Cause of action: The following is an appeal of a $5 billion punitive damages award arising out of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. 2008: Supreme Court slashes Exxon Valdez oil spill damages The U.S. Supreme Court cuts the damages that Exxon is required to pay for the Exxon Valdez oil spill, from $2.5 billion to $507,000. By William Yardley. The Supreme Court handed corporate America a major victory this week when it sharply reduced the amount of money Exxon Mobil has to pay in punitive damages for the 1989 Exxon Valdez … 1509 (D. Alaska 1991) case opinion from the US District Court for the District of Alaska The court ruled 5-3 that the damages were excessive under maritime law. The action, which named Exxon Corporation and others as defendants (collectively referred to as "Exxon"), was originally filed in Alaska state court and was later removed. Syllabus . Archive; Court Vacates $5 Billion Award in Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated the $5 billion punitive damages award against the Exxon Mobil Corp. and Exxon Shipping Co. in the case involving the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In that case, the Court refused to award punitive, or "vindictive," damages against the owner, who had not "countenanced," "directed," or "participated in" the conduct of the crew. Exxon Valdez case still twisting through courts . October 29, 2007 / 10:47 AM / AP The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether Exxon Mobil Corp. should pay punitive damages in … Plaintiffs living in Prince William Sound, the location of the spill, sued Exxon for consequential economic losses that resulted from the spill, as such plaintiffs depended on the Sound for their economic livelihood. Living on Earth host Steve Curwood speaks with Travis Vlasoff, a plaintiff in the case from Tatitlek, Alaska and Jennifer Gibbins, the soundkeeper of Prince William’s Sound. ET AL. Exxon, 270 F.3d.1215 (9th Cir. 02.26.08 Senator Murkowski addressing the Supreme Court Hearing of Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Case • Mr. President, tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of the ongoing litigation between Exxon Mobil and commercial fishermen and other plaintiffs whose livelihoods were negatively impacted by the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. The high court is teeming with Alaskans this morning, and the press office has made a superhuman effort to accommodate them all. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. Grain Growers, 767 F.2d 1379 (9th Cir. Al Grillo/AP. 3 Protectus Alpha Nav. This is one of the numerous actions arising out of the 1989 grounding of the EXXON VALDEZ in Prince William Sound, Alaska, and the resulting massive oil spill. After nearly 20 years, Exxon Mobil Corp. will have to pay punitive damages for the massive Valdez oil spill in Alaska. Their aftermaths can seem infinite. v. BAKER . 2001). Directions: Using the personal stories from the Exxon Valdez oil spill and resulting Exxon Shipping v. Baker Supreme Court case, create an I AM Poem. Photo courtesy of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council. EXXON SHIPPING CO. Both sides of the court case say it’s not about the money. The Supreme Court on June 25 dealt a blow to victims of the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster, cutting the $2.5 billion in punitive damages award for the worst oil spill in US history to $507 million. Put yourself in the position of the people described in the stories and try to best describe their feelings and thoughts in the areas below. Ninth Circuit Rules in Favor of Exxon in Lingering Case from Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. In an unpublished decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Exxon Mobil Corporation and Exxon Shipping Company (collectively “Exxon”) on the amount of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest to be paid on a prior settlement. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Footnotes 1 The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Damon T. Hartley also of Fowler White Burnett PA in the preparation of this article. Co. v. North Pac. In March 1989, the Exxon Valdez struck a reef off the coast of Alaska. ET AL. 2 In re: Exxon Valdez, 270 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. The ruling in Exxon Shipping v. Baker, No. By George Erb . Exxon-Mobil refuses to pay two and a half billion dollar in punitive damages to Alaskan residents affected by the tragic oil spill that happened 18 years ago. This case stems from the infamous Exxon Valdez oil spill off the coast of Alaska. 1985). 22 Years Later, the Exxon Valdez Case Is Back in Court. More than two decades after the Exxon Valdez supertanker struck a reef and unleashed the nation's biggest tanker spill, a lingering legal dispute about the disaster heads back to court on Friday. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. June 26, 2008 CounterVortex. Supreme Court hears Exxon Valdez case The Supreme Court on Wednesday seemed inclined to reduce the $2.5 billion award of punitive damages to victims of the Exxon Valdez disaster. Nov 5, 2000 Updated Nov 5, 2000, 9:00pm PST. In Re Exxon Valdez, 767 F. Supp. Oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp. may save about $750 million in …
Homes For Sale By Owner White County, Ar, Damas Apartment Hulhumale, Coosa County, Alabama Marriage Records, Shelton State Course Schedule, You Can See, 2021 Ford Bronco Wildtrak Horsepower, Windspeaker Radio Live, Caroline Community Radio Facebook, Spawning Meaning In Tamil,
