It was almost everywhere far too multi-faceted or ambiguous for the application of crude general labels, ‘good’ or ‘bad’, to do justice to the complex issues involved. There is a fuzziness here in the handling of globalization, whether as concept, descriptive category, or economic process, that needs to be cleared away. Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World Paperback – June 7, 2018 4.5 out of 5 stars 578 ratings See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions This begs many questions. Whatever the problems presented by that work (and they were numerous), Davis and Huttenback confirmed above all the need to ask of imperial commitments and colonial possessions who benefited, from what, and when. These are the crucial questions addressed by Niall Ferguson in "Empire". The dominant theme he wields in order to corral untidy detail is that of ‘globalization’, a process in which Britain’s empire more than any other agency promoted ‘the optimal allocation of labour, capital and goods in the world’ (p. xx). By this yardstick, the British empire … Journal DOI: 10.14296/RiH/issn.1749.8155 | Cookies | Privacy | Contact Us, http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,891477,00.html. History Documentary hosted by Niall Ferguson, published by Channel 4 in 2003 - English narration [] Cover[] InformationHistorian and presenter Niall Ferguson takes us on a fascinating journey in both time and space to explore the impact of the British empire on the modern world. The great variety of combinations of climate, geographical position, and natural endowment of resources, inevitably mean that each territory may be more or less well-placed to find its own niche in the range of economic openings prevailing at any one time. As for ‘globalization’, now well-established as a fashionable resort for the conceptually starved, what does one make of the claim that it optimises the allocation of material resources? Niall Ferguson: Empire (How Britain Made the Modern World) – The Mission Posted on February 6, 2010 by Maximilian C. Forte From the Channel 4 television series by Niall Ferguson (one of this seminar’s “new imperialists”), which accompanies his book by the same title. The central question of the book is to ... Read full review Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. It is easy to find examples of conventionally wholly critical or uncritical judgements on empire, but Ferguson is misguided in assuming that these persist in the absence of an historical literature providing material for more discriminating and nuanced assessments of empire’s record. It can surely be argued that this simple standard requires a more critical consideration than Ferguson ever suggests that it might need. A capitalist Ferguson is to be applauded for his realism in calling on historians at least to consider not ideal worlds but inescapably imperfect worlds, in which the option of ‘Anglobalization’ was if not the best, then perhaps the least worst course available. 514 reviews. Empire. Or is it to be understood as an active process of territorial integration into a world-wide market economy? Dust cover is intact; pages are clean and are not marred by notes or folds of any kind. In Niall Ferguson’s view, one of his well- selected pictures seems fairly to sum up the British Empire: a German caricature of 1904, in which Britons cheerfully torture a black man. In both cases, Ferguson metes out rough justice to complexity. The demonstration of complexity may take the form of impressing audiences with inescapable detail, illustrating in the process the inadequacy of current generalizations and conventional views. Among the latter was Jon Wilson in The Guardian (8 February 2003), condemning (with an alliteration worthy of Ferguson himself) what appeared to him a ‘glossy glorification of imperial violence’, possessing a tendency to ‘encourage policy based on a version of the history of empire that is simply wrong’.(1). If it is accepted that there was an early modern globalization under way well before the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars, that its momentum owed much to war both internationally and on local colonial frontiers, and that the prominent role of Britain in the Caribbean, North America, and parts of Asia means that it too deserves the ghastly appellation of ‘Anglobalization’ (p. xxiii), then this has implications for Ferguson’s portrayal of the post-1850 period. Outsourcing Empire: How Company-States Made the Modern World, Andrew Phillips, JC Sharman (Princeton University Press, June 2020) Outsourcing Empire suffers from the apparent drawback that its thesis seems self-evident once stated. Empire HowBritainmadethemodernworld N.Ferguson August 21 - August 28, 2005 The subtitle indicates that this is, if not exactly a celebration, at least a substantial apology of the British Empire. Britain’s many colonial wars in the nineteenth century and beyond were an essential aid to the incorporation of new territories into her own empire, and to the expansion of free trade both within her colonies and into areas beyond the reach of her direct rule. How Britain . By this yardstick, the British empire was ‘a good thing’, British rule being largely supportive of economic growth. Turns out Britain was a late starter in the empire game and followed the likes of France and Portugal. Sometimes these appear to be separated out and discontinuous, but he also knits them together in a single period and process. In fact it has become fashionable to divide mankind For decades, it has mainly provoked condemnation or at … History’s easier when empire is just empire. 103, 106). The dust jacket is missing. Ferguson's most revolutionary and popular work, EMPIRE is a major reinterpretation of the British Empire as one of the world's greatest modernising forces. Empire: the rise and demise of the British world order and the lessons for global power User Review - Not Available - Book Verdict First published in England last year (with the shorter subtitle How Britain Made the Modern World), this is intended as a cautionary tale for the United States. xviii-xix). Interested in reviewing for us? Buy It Now. Hence, as Donald Denoon demonstrated in his Settler Capitalism (Clarendon; Oxford, 1983), temperate lands of white settlement, faced with exclusion from industrial and manufacturing options, not only evolved their own forms of capitalism but did so largely irrespective of their colonial or independent status. That surely represents a significant retreat from the ground so usefully opened up to debate some fifteen years ago. When one man’s optimum can so easily encompass another’s poverty, just as orthodoxy and heresy may be interchangeable, these can too easily become weasel words, traps for the unwary even if the statistics of measurement such as GDP are to be relied upon, which often they are not. ← Niall Ferguson: Empire (How Britain Made the Modern World) – Heaven’s Breed. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Empire : How Britain Made the Modern World at Amazon.com. "A remarkably readable precis of the whole British imperial story - triumphs, deceits, decencies, kindnesses, cruelties and all". Ferguson has no doubt that Empire ‘enhanced global welfare – in other words was a Good Thing’. ("Sunday Times"). A little riskily, Niall Ferguson's history of the British Empire opens … We have noticed that there is an issue with your subscription billing details. Buy Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World 01 by Ferguson, Niall (ISBN: 9780141987910) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. ("New York Review of Books"). The spine may show signs of wear. Ferguson, author of The Pity of War and The Cash Nexus, does not so much provide a synoptic survey of the British empire since the 17th century, as an arresting argument about why it arose, and how it fell.Ferguson's emphasis throughout is on the … At its peak it governed a quarter of the world's land and people and dominated all its seas. In Niall Ferguson’s view, one of his well- selected pictures seems fairly to sum up the British Empire: a German caricature of 1904, in which Britons cheerfully torture a black man. General Information . Ferguson’s own ‘on-balance-beneficial’ legacy of empire offers no new insight but rather the refurbishment of a much older conventional – some would say Whiggish – wisdom. In calculating imperial Britain’s favourable legacy, the twentieth-century alternative empires of Germany, Italy and Japan are cited to provide horrific counterweights, had they managed to turn conquest into more than temporary colonial controls. xxiv-xxv). For better and for worse, the world we now know is in large measure the product of Britain's Age of Empire. However, the reality of the imperialism of free trade that underlay this option was far more constraining and less benign than Ferguson seems to acknowledge. Empire : How Britain Made the Modern World by Ferguson, Niall A copy that has been read, but remains in clean condition. xix-xx), but also to earlier eras or phases of globalization. Stark intellectual polarities, however, can be a snare and delusion especially in the history of empire, so riddled as it is with complexities and ambiguity. Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World (2003), Ferguson’s next book, appeared in America with a more didactic subtitle: ‘The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power’. In seeking to argue that the empire was not economically bad for both Britain and her colonies, Ferguson sets up an Aunt Sally no less grand and vulnerable than that constructed by some of the historians he criticises. The … In particular A. G. Hopkins, Globalization in World History (London, 2002); and Global History: Interactions Between the Universal and the Local, ed. The second follows from that: free trade cannot necessarily be equated with freedom of choice and opportunity. Soon however the British moved onto their own kind of white gold; sugar. Ferguson has a quick eye for the riveting analogy – New South Wales, ‘the eighteenth-century equivalent of Mars’, where Australians ‘started out as a nation of shoplifters’ (pp. Use the HTML below. The programmes are certainly best seen well spaced. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. 'The most brilliant British historian of his generation ... Ferguson examines the roles of "pirates, planters, missionaries, mandarins, bankers and bankrupts" in the creation of history's largest empire …
Natalie Flores Games Journalist, Vancouver Radio Stations 60's 70s 80s, Lisa Manoban Game, Poeme Le Corbeau Et Le Renard, Turbo Call Infini, Athena Tattoo Sketch, John Boy And Billy Iheartradio,
